1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00099.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
400
0
11

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(431 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
400
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The global score is the sum of local scores, and acne severity was graded using the global score. A score of 1 -18 is considered mild; 19 -30, moderate; 31 -38, severe; and >39, very severe [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global score is the sum of local scores, and acne severity was graded using the global score. A score of 1 -18 is considered mild; 19 -30, moderate; 31 -38, severe; and >39, very severe [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline acne grading was done based on Global Acne Grading System [7] and acne classified as mild, moderate, severe and very severe (Tab. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence and location of comedones, inflammatory papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts were noted, and the severity of acne was assessed using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) developed by Doshi et al . 15 The presence of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was noted, and its severity was graded as mild, moderate, or severe. The presence and nature of acne scars were also noted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%