2014
DOI: 10.1177/1555343414532101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Covert and Videotape Modeling Strategies for Training Complex Mechanical Assembly Tasks

Abstract: Experimentation was conducted comparing videotape self-modeling and videotape peer/other modeling to self-directed mental rehearsal (a covert modeling procedure) and a no-training (physical practice) control condition in training a mechanical device assembly task. Eighty male and female college students were introduced to the assembly task in a timed pretest trial and then videotaped performing the assembly task in a second trial. Over the next 4 days, subjects were randomly assigned to training conditions and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, when workers were observing themselves, they were astonished because they figured that they adopted recommended positions. It does not mean that they reacted negatively when they watched themselves, something that happened in the study of Linnerooth et al [49], who associated the negative reactions of workers with non-self-observation effects. This is an issue that has to be considered because not everyone likes watching their own behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, when workers were observing themselves, they were astonished because they figured that they adopted recommended positions. It does not mean that they reacted negatively when they watched themselves, something that happened in the study of Linnerooth et al [49], who associated the negative reactions of workers with non-self-observation effects. This is an issue that has to be considered because not everyone likes watching their own behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%