2007
DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2007)9[149:acoccv]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of conventional capture versus PIT reader techniques for estimating survival and capture probabilities of big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We based the survival estimates on encounters of tagged bats with PIT tag readers in fixed positions at entrances of five roosts monitored from 2001–2005 [46]. Survival was calculated using Program Mark with differences between the seropositive and negative groups determined by χ 2 goodness-of-fit tests in Program Release Test 1 [49], [65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We based the survival estimates on encounters of tagged bats with PIT tag readers in fixed positions at entrances of five roosts monitored from 2001–2005 [46]. Survival was calculated using Program Mark with differences between the seropositive and negative groups determined by χ 2 goodness-of-fit tests in Program Release Test 1 [49], [65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seasonal mortality. Using mark-recapture techniques from previous research (22,23), we demonstrated that mortality rates in big brown bats vary across the different seasons (Table 1). Mortality is lower during the hibernation period and higher during the summer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Second, there are no persistent multihost dynamics for BRV in bats (17,18), which seems to be a requirement for rabies maintenance in East African wildlife (19,20). Third, big brown bats have high fidelity to roosting areas within (21) and across seasons and years (22,23). Thus, we can assume that we are capturing the dynamics of the same population through time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Neubaum et al 2007;O'Shea et al 2010O'Shea et al , 2011. Methods of capture and tagging, which are described elsewhere (Ellison et al 2007b;O'Shea et al 2004;Wimsatt et al 2005), conformed to American Society of Mammalogists guidelines for the use of animals in research (Sikes et al 2011) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Colorado State University and the United States Geological Survey. Bats were captured under authority of a scientific collecting license issued by the Colorado Division of Wildlife.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoop-style PIT-tag readers (Ellison et al 2007a(Ellison et al , 2007bWimsatt et al 2005) were used to record movements by individuals that used entry/exit points at selected roosts from May to September of each study year. Most roosts contained only 1 major opening, although a few had multiple access points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%