1990
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of continuation versus late intensification followed by discontinuation of chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. A prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (G.O.I.R.C.)

Abstract: One hundred ninety-eight postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma were entered in this study. After six induction cycles with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF), patients with at least stable disease were randomized to the "continuation arm" (continuation of CMF until progression) (A, 49 evaluable patients) or to the "intensification-discontinuation arm" (addition of adriamycin and vincristine to two of the three drugs of CMF for six more cycles; i.e., CMAV, CFAV, MFAV, twice;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time to progression was statistically signi cantly better in 4 studies using continuous therapy:increased number of courses (154,193,194,196). Furthermore, in the Italian study, intensi cation therapy and immediate switch to an anthracycline -CMF rotating regimen for six more courses (46 evaluable patients) was not signi cantly better than continuous CMF (49 evaluable patients) therapy followed by an anthracycline as second line therapy, as regards time to progression (p ¾ 0.47) and survival (p¾ 0.55) (131). In the small British study of only 43 patients no difference could be detected (195).…”
Section: Duration Of Therapymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Time to progression was statistically signi cantly better in 4 studies using continuous therapy:increased number of courses (154,193,194,196). Furthermore, in the Italian study, intensi cation therapy and immediate switch to an anthracycline -CMF rotating regimen for six more courses (46 evaluable patients) was not signi cantly better than continuous CMF (49 evaluable patients) therapy followed by an anthracycline as second line therapy, as regards time to progression (p ¾ 0.47) and survival (p¾ 0.55) (131). In the small British study of only 43 patients no difference could be detected (195).…”
Section: Duration Of Therapymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The CMFEV regimen used in the current trial is an innovative schedule aimed at administering five partially or totally noncross‐resistant cytotoxic agents, first designed and tested by our group as a means of late intensification after CMF in metastatic disease,14 and whose rotational strategy is different from that of alternating or sequential schemes. All five agents are administered at full dose, but, to avoid excessive toxicity and consequent dose reductions, each cycle involves the administration of only four drugs, always including vincristine, and is organized in such a way that only three among the four potentially myelotoxic drugs (C, M, F, E) are rotatively included (CMFV, CMEV, CFEV, MFEV); the planned dosages of C, M, F, and E in each cycle were therefore either 100% or 0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first designed and tested by our Group as a means of late intensification after CMF in metastatic breast carcinoma [9] and then in the neoadjuvant setting of operable breast carcinoma [10,11]. Its rotational strategy is different from that of alternating or sequential schemes as the five agents are administered at full dose but, in order to avoid excessive toxicity and consequent dose reductions, each cycle involves the administration of only four drugs, always including vincristine (V) and epirubicin (E).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%