2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of concurrent cisplatin versus cetuximab with radiotherapy in locally-advanced head and neck cancer: A bi-institutional analysis

Abstract: In our retrospective analysis, patients undergoing CRT experienced improved OS and CSS over those receiving BRT; however, disease control did not significantly differ. These findings may inform management of LAHNSCC patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OS overall survival, CRT radiochemoradiotherapy with cisplatin, RIT radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab, RT radiotherapy not give recommendations on preferred treatment options but aimed at prospectively documenting current treatment strategies for advanced SCCHN in different tertiary cancer centers around the country. Thus, we report an unselected cohort of patients with distribution of age, primary tumor site and stage similar to recent literature [11,15]. The majority of patients within the registry were treated with postoperative or definitive CRT or RIT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…OS overall survival, CRT radiochemoradiotherapy with cisplatin, RIT radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab, RT radiotherapy not give recommendations on preferred treatment options but aimed at prospectively documenting current treatment strategies for advanced SCCHN in different tertiary cancer centers around the country. Thus, we report an unselected cohort of patients with distribution of age, primary tumor site and stage similar to recent literature [11,15]. The majority of patients within the registry were treated with postoperative or definitive CRT or RIT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In these patients, other radiosensitizing strategies including monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, which has a more favorable safety profile than cisplatin, might be an attractive option. In fact, the superior efficacy of definitive radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with cetuximab compared to definitive radiotherapy (RT) alone was shown in a randomized phase III trial [8]; however, CRT with cisplatin has already been shown to be superior to RIT with cetuximab in a definitive setting through various prospective and retrospective studies [9][10][11]. In the postoperative setting, the monoclonal antibody has not yet been extensively studied or compared to adjuvant CRT with cisplatin or radiotherapy alone and is therefore not approved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding is supported by similar data [ 20 , 44 ], which confirmed that toxicity of platinum derivates and cetuximab is comparable. However, other authors have shown that BRT with cetuximab resulted in poorer overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional control, and distant metastasis-free survival than cisplatin-based therapy [ 11 , 20 , 45 ]. Altogether, these results practically reduce the value of cetuximab in the treatment of advanced HNC, but cetuximab still remains a valuable option for patients with contraindications to platinum-based therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the majority of cases, the standard procedure includes platin-based chemotherapy and subsequent irradiation [41]. Unfortunately, the activity of cisplatin is not specific towards cancer cells, which are more susceptible than healthy counterparts only because of their higher proliferation rate [42]. This lack of selective targeting corresponds with high toxicity of therapy and the incidence of serious adverse effects, which not only decreases the quality of life but might trigger severe complications [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%