2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182412980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Combustion Properties in Biomass–Coal Blends Using Characteristic and Kinetic Analyses

Abstract: This paper presents comparative research on the combustion of coal, wheat, corn straw (CS), beet residues after extracting sugar (BR), and their blends, coal–corn straw blends (CCSBs), coal–wheat blends (CWBs), and coal–beet residue blends (CBRBs), using thermogravimetric (TG) analysis under 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 °C/min. The test results indicate that CS and wheat show better combustion properties than BR, which are recommended to be used in biomass combustion. Under the heating rate of 20 °C/min, the coal has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comprehensive combustibility index S N was used to characterize the combustion characteristics of samples. The detailed calculation method is introduced through the previous research [22,23].…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive combustibility index S N was used to characterize the combustion characteristics of samples. The detailed calculation method is introduced through the previous research [22,23].…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intricate and diverse composition of biomass presents a challenge as various reactions can take place during the conversion process, and the degree of these reactions is dependent on numerous parameters and conditions [13]. Therefore, studying the thermal decomposition kinetics of biomass is crucial to finding the mechanism of the process, predict the conversion of it, and optimize reactor system design for efficient conversion [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%