A comparison of cohorts of children with cerebral palsy from a population register and hospital admission data: A data linkage study

Abstract

BackgroundAdministrative health data, such as hospital admission data, are often used in research to identify children/young people with cerebral palsy (CP).ObjectivesTo compare sociodemographic, clinical details and mortality of children/young people identified as having CP in either a CP population registry or hospital admission data.MethodsWe identified two cohorts of children/young people (birth years 2001–2010, age at study end or death 2 months to 19 years 6 months) with a diagnosis of CP from either (i) the New South Wales (NSW)/Australian Capital Territory (ACT) CP Register or (ii) NSW hospital admission data (2001–2020). Using record linkage, these data sources were linked to each other and NSW Death, Perinatal, and Disability datasets. We determined the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of CP diagnosis in hospital admission data compared with the NSW/ACT CP Register (gold standard). We then compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and mortality of the two cohorts available through record linkage using standardised mean difference (SMD).ResultsThere were 1598 children/young people with CP in the NSW/ACT CP Register and 732–2439 children/young people with CP in hospital admission data, depending on the case definition used. The sensitivity of hospital admission data for diagnosis of CP ranged from 0.40–0.74 and PPV 0.47–0.73. Compared with children/young people with CP identified in the NSW/ACT CP Register, a greater proportion of those identified in hospital admission data (one or more admissions with G80 case definition) were older, lived in major cities, had comorbidities including epilepsy, gastrostomy use, intellectual disability and autism, and died during the study period (SMD > 0.1).ConclusionsSociodemographic and clinical characteristics differ between cohorts of children/young people with CP identified using a CP register or hospital admission data. Those identified in hospital admission data have higher rates of comorbidities and death, suggesting some may have progressive conditions and not CP. These differences should be considered when planning and interpreting research using various data sources.