1999
DOI: 10.1007/s001910050088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of clustering dynamics in the US and UK computer industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are largely in consonance with previously-published studies that stress the positive feedback of clustering [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Agglomeration or external economies promote the growth of incumbent firms and attract the entry of new firms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are largely in consonance with previously-published studies that stress the positive feedback of clustering [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Agglomeration or external economies promote the growth of incumbent firms and attract the entry of new firms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Previous surveys in other regions show that clustering has positive influences on firms' growth as knowledge accumulated by one firm would help the technology evolve in other firms [36]. Regionally-specialised industries would benefit from the within-cluster transmission of knowledge and, therefore, should grow faster on the whole of being together [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Swann and Prevezer (1996) argue that new firms in biotechnology are strongly attracted to the presence of a strong science base at the location and Prevezer (1997) adds that new companies are also attracted by the entry of other new companies. Baptista and Swann (1999) find that by entry of new firms the cluster attracts even more other firms and that this cluster self-reinforcing effect could start out of the emergence of one strong firm. Feldman (2003) later develop the anchor tenant hypothesis, which suggests that large high-technology agglomerations tend to be created by the investment of large corporations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, Spencer et al (2010), using a data set for 300 industries in 140 city-regions in Canada, found that industries located in areas with critical mass of related industries tend to display higher incomes and rates of growth compared with those located in non-clustered settings. In a comparative study of clustering in the US and UK computer industries, Baptista and Swann (1999) found that firms in strong clusters tend to grow faster. The study by on the Appalachian technology clusters delivered mixed results.…”
Section: The Economic Importance Of Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%