2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of clay colloid and artificial microsphere transport in natural discrete fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(79 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bromide arrived at the center of mass (0.5 C/C 0 ) at 3.5 ± 0.4 fracture volumes, much earlier than Li + (6.4 ± 0.8 fracture volumes), although they exhibited similar early arrival times. These results concur with those reported by Zvikelsky and Weisbrod (2006) and Zvikelsky et al (2008) for a different fractured chalk core and imply a marked retardation of Li + vs. Br − transport (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bromide arrived at the center of mass (0.5 C/C 0 ) at 3.5 ± 0.4 fracture volumes, much earlier than Li + (6.4 ± 0.8 fracture volumes), although they exhibited similar early arrival times. These results concur with those reported by Zvikelsky and Weisbrod (2006) and Zvikelsky et al (2008) for a different fractured chalk core and imply a marked retardation of Li + vs. Br − transport (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…3–8). Zeta potentials of montmorillonite and chalk in the tracer solution in this study were close to the values reported by Tang and Weisbrod (2009) and Zvikelsky et al (2008)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We showed that intermittent rainfall can mobilize microspheres, and the mobilization could be particularly high in soil with greater permeability because of the presence of macropores. However, the transport and mobilization of actual pathogens can vary from that of microspheres (Harvey et al, 1989), possibly due to differences in contact points (Harvey et al, 2011), shape (Aramrak et al, 2013), density (Zvikelsky et al, 2008), and surface properties (Weisbrod et al, 2013). Furthermore, pathogens could lose their virulence and, perhaps, their viability during desiccation; both factors could either decrease or increase the mobilization of viable, infectious pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%