2021
DOI: 10.3102/0034654321998074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Children’s Reading on Paper Versus Screen: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: This meta-analysis examines the inconsistent findings across experimental studies that compared children’s learning outcomes with digital and paper books. We quantitatively reviewed 39 studies reported in 30 articles (n = 1,812 children) and compared children’s story comprehension and vocabulary learning in relation to medium (reading on paper versus on-screen), design enhancements in digital books, the presence of a dictionary, and adult support for children aged between 1 and 8 years. The comparison of digit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
72
1
13

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(109 reference statements)
7
72
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…There are multiple advantages concerning using these devices in the learning process, including stimulus, motivation, ease of use, availability, connectivity, among others (Kim et al, 2021). Smart mobile devices could become the new means of providing educational content to students (Furenes et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple advantages concerning using these devices in the learning process, including stimulus, motivation, ease of use, availability, connectivity, among others (Kim et al, 2021). Smart mobile devices could become the new means of providing educational content to students (Furenes et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying a fine‐grained analysis to the macrostructures that govern media content (Linebarger et al, 2017) and considering how incidental–intentional learning environments (Hulstijn, 2003) contribute to L2 word learning in media, the narrative instructional context may have been more cognitively demanding of DLL viewers, requiring them to discern new, heavily contextualized words that were tossed between characters in dialogue. New information in narrative genres is similarly challenging for preschoolers to process in both digital media and in‐person environments (Courage, 2019; Furenes, Kucirkova, & Bus, 2021; Neuman, Wong, & Kaefer, 2017; Wong & Neuman, 2019b). Drawing from shared book reading pedagogy that often uses narrative storybooks to promote both L1 and L2 language and literacy development in young children (Flack, Field, & Horst, 2018), researchers acknowledge the importance of providing explicit guidance (e.g., offering pre‐ and post‐reading activities that reinforce the content of the book) and reading comprehension skills (e.g., using context clues to decipher unfamiliar words) to reduce the cognitive demands needed to understand narrative texts (Fitton, McIlraith, & Wood, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying a fine-grained analysis to the macrostructures that govern media content (Linebarger et al, 2017) and considering how incidental-intentional learning environments (Hulstijn, 2003) contribute to L2 word learning in media, the narrative instructional context may have been more cognitively demanding of DLL viewers, requiring them to discern new, heavily contextualized words that were tossed between characters in dialogue. New information in narrative genres is similarly challenging for preschoolers to process in both digital media and in-person environments (Courage, 2019;Furenes, Kucirkova, & Bus, 2021;Neuman, Wong, & Kaefer, 2017;Wong & Neuman, 2019b).…”
Section: Lower Ppvt Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often studied additions to the primarily book-like designs of a new generation of digital picture books are animations or sounds that occur automatically or when a user touches a specific spot on the screen (Christ et al, 2019; Korat & Falk, 2017; Piotrowski & Kcmar, 2017; Unsworth, 2014; Xu et al, 2020). As a recent meta-analysis confirmed, these enhancements in so far providing information about the meaning of not-so-familiar words may distract children’s attention from the storyline and interfere with meaning making (Furenes et al, 2021). The more promising versions of such enhancements activate background knowledge or provide an additional explanation (e.g., clicking on people sitting in the doctor’s waiting room reveals why they are there).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%