2019
DOI: 10.1177/0004563219876671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of cardiac troponin T delta change methods and the importance of the clinical context in the assessment of acute coronary syndrome

Abstract: Background The management of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome is a significant challenge for clinicians. Guidelines for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction require a rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin, along with other criteria. Knowing what constitutes a significant delta change from baseline is still unclear and the literature is varied. Methods We compared three methods for determining cardiac troponin delta changes (relative, absolute and z-scores) for dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Similar performance for the diagnosis of AMI was also recently shown using z-scores for the Roche hs-TnT assay. 9 Overall, the performance of z-score was equivalent to an absolute delta change and better than a relative delta change for the diagnosis of AMI. 5,9 Despite the excellent diagnostic accuracy of z-scores for the diagnosis of AMI, there have been few studies assessing the association with other cardiac diagnoses and cardiac intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Similar performance for the diagnosis of AMI was also recently shown using z-scores for the Roche hs-TnT assay. 9 Overall, the performance of z-score was equivalent to an absolute delta change and better than a relative delta change for the diagnosis of AMI. 5,9 Despite the excellent diagnostic accuracy of z-scores for the diagnosis of AMI, there have been few studies assessing the association with other cardiac diagnoses and cardiac intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…9 Overall, the performance of z-score was equivalent to an absolute delta change and better than a relative delta change for the diagnosis of AMI. 5,9 Despite the excellent diagnostic accuracy of z-scores for the diagnosis of AMI, there have been few studies assessing the association with other cardiac diagnoses and cardiac intervention. Additionally, clinical outcomes of patients with non-dynamic troponin elevations (as defined by a normal z-score) remain largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%