ReplyTo The intention of our study was to present our experience from a viewpoint which is lacking in the current literature. Undoubtedly, there are both potential risks and advantages from surgical ductal non-closure during MBTS in the setting of pulmonary atresia. In response to the points made in Dr El-Rassi's letter, it is important to mention that, despite the same MBTS size and insertion site policy for all patients, no single acute deterioration from low cardiac output developed in the subgroup with the PDA left open. Hence, it is unlikely that the consequences of high pulmonary blood flow have triggered the acute hemodynamic compromise exclusively in neonates with surgically closed PDA.Petrucci and colleagues [3] reported a large cohort of 1,273 newborns with MBTS and they observed no difference in discharge mortality and morbidity according to operative PDA management. However, some relevant periprocedural data was lacking in this valuable analysis: absence or presence of additional pulmonary blood flow, surgical approach, preoperative PDA patency, preoperative prostaglandin infusion, and shunt size. Significant differences between institutions could be expected in some of the above-mentioned factors. It is noteworthy that the PDA management strategy was equally distributed between closure and nonclosure in this study. This likely reflects the individual decisionmaking for specific neonates, but one could also hypothesize that different protocols among individual centers and surgeons were used because of the absence of relevant published data.There is a need for more data about different aspects of neonatal shunt procedures (sternotomy versus thoracotomy, optimal weight adjusted shunt size, operative PDA management in different anatomic settings, and surgical approach versus PDA stenting) in the near future. Then we may be able to move from hypotheses to evidence-based strategy. In our cohort, the patient selection was mainly based on pulmonary artery diameter, ie Յ2 to 3 mm. In our modification, the main pulmonary artery was detached from the right ventricular outflow and simple clamped, and an end-to-end anastomosis of a 3-mm to 3.5-mm GoreTex graft was made to the main pulmonary artery. Holes were created at the corresponding surfaces of the graft and the lateral aortic wall, and a side-to-side anastomosis of the graft was made here, followed by oversewing of the open end of the graft. Pulmonary artery branches were not snared, and in none of our patients was cardiopulmonary bypass needed [3,4].An end-to-end anastomosis between the graft and the pulmonary artery is anatomic and provides more physiologic flow. The graft is secured from mediastinal drain compression with the anastomosis of the graft to the lateral surface of the aorta. Additionally, secondary median sternotomy and aortic cannulation are facilitated during corrective surgical procedures. In none of our cases were we faced with graft thrombosis with the 1400 CORRESPONDENCE Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1398 -401
MISCELLANEOUS