2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.140812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of bending-fatigue properties of surface-induction-hardened SAE 1045 bar steels with and without vanadium and the influence of comparable low-temperature induction-tempering and furnace-tempering treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hardness was measured using HRS‐150 Rockwell hardness tester at room temperature and at least 10 points were measured on each specimen. The Rockwell hardness was converted to Vickers hardness to substitute hardness values into different models, as defined by Equation (1): [ 20,21 ] HV=223×HRC+14500100HRC$$\text{HV=} \frac{223 \times \text{HRC} + 14500}{100 - \text{HRC}}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardness was measured using HRS‐150 Rockwell hardness tester at room temperature and at least 10 points were measured on each specimen. The Rockwell hardness was converted to Vickers hardness to substitute hardness values into different models, as defined by Equation (1): [ 20,21 ] HV=223×HRC+14500100HRC$$\text{HV=} \frac{223 \times \text{HRC} + 14500}{100 - \text{HRC}}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…given in Figure 1 were determined in rotation bending tests and the deviation observed for materials with a higher hardness is partially caused by residual stresses at the surface [11]. As this loading condition results in a stress gradient from the surface to the inner material, an increased influence of residual stresses in relation to uniaxial fatigue testing occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%