1993
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1993.1246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Bathophenanthrolinedisulfonic Acid and Ferrozine as Chelators of Iron(II) in Reduction Reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Fe-citrate uptake experiments, a stock solution of 100 µmol/L 55 FeCl 3 was prepared in the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of citrate as described by Richardson and Ponka. 38 Reduction from Fe 3ϩ to Fe 2ϩ in the presence of ascorbate (1-20 minutes of incubation) was measured as described by Cowart et al 39 Briefly, Fe-NTA (final concentration 1-40 µmol/L) was added to phosphate buffered saline or medium containing 20 mmol/L HEPES, 1 mmol/L ascorbate, and 1.5 mmol/L ferrozine, and the absorbance was measured at 562 nm. The concentration of Fe 2ϩ was calculated by comparing the sample absorbance with that obtained for standards containing 1-60 µmol/L ferrous sulphate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Fe-citrate uptake experiments, a stock solution of 100 µmol/L 55 FeCl 3 was prepared in the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of citrate as described by Richardson and Ponka. 38 Reduction from Fe 3ϩ to Fe 2ϩ in the presence of ascorbate (1-20 minutes of incubation) was measured as described by Cowart et al 39 Briefly, Fe-NTA (final concentration 1-40 µmol/L) was added to phosphate buffered saline or medium containing 20 mmol/L HEPES, 1 mmol/L ascorbate, and 1.5 mmol/L ferrozine, and the absorbance was measured at 562 nm. The concentration of Fe 2ϩ was calculated by comparing the sample absorbance with that obtained for standards containing 1-60 µmol/L ferrous sulphate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no pH dependence was observed when bipyridyl was used as chelator, indicating that the pH dependence was an artifact of the chelator assay. Chelator effects on measuring Fe 3ϩ reduction have been noted previously (44). Therefore, we redesigned the release assay so that chelator was not present until the point at which we wished to observe the concentration of immediately available Fe 2ϩ .…”
Section: Reductant and Chelator Dependence Of Bfr Iron Releasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Various drawbacks have been identified with all available Fe(II) methods. It is relatively straightforward, for example, to demonstrate that the unmodified ferrozine method appears to over-estimate nanomolar Fe(II) concentrations in some natural waters (Figure 3; Murray and Gill, 1978;Box, 1984;Cowart et al, 1993), which could be attributed to reduction of labile Fe(III) phases in the presence of NOM after the ferrozine ligand is added. Short mixing times between ferrozine addition and absorbance measurement, combined with handling samples in the dark and buffering to near-neutral pH, is reported to minimize, although not eliminate, the interference due to labile Fe(III) reduction (Box, 1984;Pullin and Cabaniss, 2001).…”
Section: Potential Explanations For Inter-methods Differences In Fe(iimentioning
confidence: 99%