2009
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/10/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of automatic fall detection by the cross-product and magnitude of tri-axial acceleration

Abstract: Falling is an important problem in the health maintenance of people above middle age. Portable accelerometer systems have been designed to detect falls. However, false alarms induced by some dynamic motions, such as walking and jumping, are difficult to avoid. Acceleration cross-product (AC)-related methods are proposed and examined by this study to seek solutions for detecting falls with less motion-evoked false alarms. A set of tri-axial acceleration data is collected during simulated falls, posture transfer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bourke et al [20] monitored the posture change before and after a fall, without the criteria of a lying end posture. In some fall detection algorithms, the horizontal end posture for the lying posture after the fall-associated impact has been used as one criterion for a fall [26,35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bourke et al [20] monitored the posture change before and after a fall, without the criteria of a lying end posture. In some fall detection algorithms, the horizontal end posture for the lying posture after the fall-associated impact has been used as one criterion for a fall [26,35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the common assumption that a horizontal trunk position classifies a resting phase was not confirmed by the analysed data on trunk pitch angle. This potentially false assumption could hamper fall detection algorithms from detecting specific post-impact lying positions [15,16] . Fallers with long lying periods commonly attempted multiple times to stand up over their entire "resting" period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first class involves onbody motion sensing, where falling is inferred by characteristic patterns in body acceleration and motion [6,[41][42][43][44][45][46], as illustrated in Fig. 2 …”
Section: Fall Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is to demonstrate that a Parkinson's disease limb tremor monitoring system, such as in [2], could be easily upgraded with fall-detection capabilities, without additional W 2 SNs or moving nodes around. For a pure fall-detection WBAN disregarding primary application sensor placement, it is worth noting that studies on sensor placement to record acceleration due to falls has so far been inconclusive [46]; some have suggested behind the ear [41], the trunk [6] or the head and waist [43] areas as being the optimum locations for a fall sensor.…”
Section: Fall Detection Enhancement Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%