A Comparison of Arc of Motion, Radiological Parameters of the Wrist and Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation between Adult Transfusion Dependent Thalassemics and Normal Subjects

Abstract

Background: Bony deformities and arthropathies have been noticed in thalassemia patients. The aim of this study is to compare the arc of motion and radiological parameters of the wrist and patient rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) between adult transfusion-dependent thalassemics and normal subjects. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was done in the department of orthopaedics over a period of 2 years where a total of 30 skeletally mature thalassemia major patients (group A) were assessed. The data was then compared with the data of demographically matched 30 healthy adults (group B). Arc of motion of the dominant wrist that included flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation, pronation and supination was measured using a handheld goniometer for both groups. Radiographs of the dominant wrist were obtained in both groups and used to determine the radial height, radial articular angle and carpal slip. PRWE was used to assess the function of the wrist. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Clinical abnormalities at the wrist joint were found in 80% of thalassaemia patients. There was a statistically significant increase in ulnar deviation, wrist extension and decrease in wrist flexion in group A compared to group B. Radiological abnormalities were found in 100% of thalassaemia patients. All the radiological parameters were significantly increased in group A compared to group B. There were no differences in PRWE scores between both groups. Conclusion: Clinical and radiological changes of wrist joint occur in skeletally mature thalassaemia major patients due to shortened ulna compared to healthy adults. This may be due to disease itself, bone marrow expansion, osteopenia, drug (chelating agent) or iron toxicity. Understanding the changes at the wrist in patients with thalassemia major is important to increasing the life expectancy of these patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Diagnostic)