1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11221.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of anaesthetic breathing systems during spontaneous ventilation

Abstract: SummaryFive anaesthetic breathing systems (Magill, Lack, Humphrey ADE, enclosed Magill and Bain) were compared using spontaneous ventilation in a simple lung model. The fresh gas flow at which rebreathing occurred was determined for each system by the application of four modiJed definitions of rebreathing. Two were based on the measurement of minimum inspired and two on end-expired carbon dioxide. The four A systems performed similarly with each individual definition. The rebreathing points found for each indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fractional utilization curve shown in figure 2 is similar to that obtained by Rose and Froese using a Bain system [12], and that obtained by Snowdon and colleagues using one of two circle systems without an absorber with a tidal volume of 750 ml [10]. This suggests that, although there are well-documented advantages of the EAR during spontaneous ventilation [13,14], there may be little difference in clinical efficiency between the above systems during controlled ventilation. This agrees with the work of Criswell and colleagues, who found only a small difference in PE' COI values in patients during ventilation with an EAR system and the Bain (0.35 kPa), and concluded that they were of similar clinical efficiency [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The fractional utilization curve shown in figure 2 is similar to that obtained by Rose and Froese using a Bain system [12], and that obtained by Snowdon and colleagues using one of two circle systems without an absorber with a tidal volume of 750 ml [10]. This suggests that, although there are well-documented advantages of the EAR during spontaneous ventilation [13,14], there may be little difference in clinical efficiency between the above systems during controlled ventilation. This agrees with the work of Criswell and colleagues, who found only a small difference in PE' COI values in patients during ventilation with an EAR system and the Bain (0.35 kPa), and concluded that they were of similar clinical efficiency [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Bain system demonstrated rebreathing even at considerably higher fresh gas flows. 14 In this study an effective EtCO2 level of 28.230.99 mm of Hg. Could be maintain using the Circle absorber system with a fixed fresh gas flow of 4.5 litres and the average FiCO2 level was in the order of 0.390.07%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The lung model used [7] produced a sinusoidal ventilatory flow pattern, with a tidal volume of 400 ml, tracheal volume equivalent to the deadspace (130 ml) and minute ventilation of 6 litre min" 1 . The peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) was measured with a Fleisch pneumotachograph and found to be 20 litre min" 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%