2020
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl

Abstract: Wild birds of the Anseriformes and Charadriiformes order represent a natural and asymptomatic reservoir for avian influenza viruses (AIv) that infect domestic, captive and wild free-ranging bird species (Pantin-Jackwood & Swayne, 2009). Due to the presence of influenza A viruses in waterfowl which can be excreted from faecal/oral routes into the environment (Ronnqvist, Ziegler, von Bonsdorff, & Maunula, 2012),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This uncoupling of detection by qRT-PCR vs sequencing is likely due to the fact that qRT-PCR targets only a small portion of the genome and sequencing primers cover the entire genome (e.g. [ 35 ]). Furthemore, environmental samples in particular may have been degraded or diluted, affecting the genomic RNA available for reverse transcription, as observed in multiple studies of environmental samples [ 36 38 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This uncoupling of detection by qRT-PCR vs sequencing is likely due to the fact that qRT-PCR targets only a small portion of the genome and sequencing primers cover the entire genome (e.g. [ 35 ]). Furthemore, environmental samples in particular may have been degraded or diluted, affecting the genomic RNA available for reverse transcription, as observed in multiple studies of environmental samples [ 36 38 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This uncoupling of detection by qRT-PCR vs sequencing is likely due to the fact that qRT-PCR targets only a small portion of the genome and sequencing primers cover the entire genome (e.g. [35]). Furthemore, environmental…”
Section: Whole-genome Pcr and Sequencing Yields More Effective Detection Of Sars-cov-2 Than Qrt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This uncoupling of detection by qRT-PCR vs sequencing is likely due to the fact that qRT-PCR targets only a small portion of the genome and sequencing primers cover the entire genome (e.g. (33)). Furthemore, environmental samples in particular may have been degraded or diluted, affecting the genomic RNA available for reverse transcription, as observed in multiple studies of environmental samples ((3436).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersion of virus-contaminated fecal matter and oropharyngeal excretions in surface waters is expected to potentiate transmission efficacy: (1) Depending on the AI virus strain but also on various physico-chemical properties of the water body such as temperature, pH, salinity, sedimentation rates, presence of biologic compounds and so on, the infectivity of virus particles shed into such water is retained for astonishingly long periods of up to several months [ 26 ]. Conversely, higher water temperatures (22°C), alkaline or acid pH and high salinity inactivate viral infectivity within hours to days [ 26–30 , 31 ]. Furthermore, the presence of invertebrate animals (clams, snails, shrimps, insects) may modulate the retention time of infectious AIV in surface water and sediments [ 26 , 32–34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%