2021
DOI: 10.26650/experimed.2021.942836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Actual Graft Weight and Estimated Graft Volume Calculated with New Software Used for Anatomical and Volumetric Analysis of the Liver with Computed Tomography in Living Liver Donors

Abstract: Objective: In the living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) context, accurate estimation of the graft weight to recipient weight ratio (GRWR) and future donor liver remnant volume by pre-operative volumetric analysis is very important. We aimed to compare the estimated graft volume (EGV) calculated with the LiverVision® software with the actual graft weight (AGW) measured in the back-table in this study. Material and Method:Patients who underwent right lobe LDLT and liver donors between 01.01.2018-30.05.2020 w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our investigation found no significant difference between EGWs and AGWs. Trends of underestimation or overestimation may be attributed to the type of software used to estimate liver volume [ 13 - 15 ]. The use of conventional CT versus semi-automatic three-dimensional CT volumetry might give different results [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our investigation found no significant difference between EGWs and AGWs. Trends of underestimation or overestimation may be attributed to the type of software used to estimate liver volume [ 13 - 15 ]. The use of conventional CT versus semi-automatic three-dimensional CT volumetry might give different results [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of conventional CT versus semi-automatic three-dimensional CT volumetry might give different results [ 16 , 17 ]. However, differences in graft weight (GW) estimation of ±5% to ±20% were quite common [ 13 , 14 , 16 ]. We recommend that each LT team learn the characteristics of their center’s diagnostic tools to be prepared for any discrepancies in the estimation of GW [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%