2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10732-018-9377-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of acceptance criteria for the adaptive large neighbourhood search metaheuristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting parameter configurations were: AlnsBestMult = 1.9307, AlnsAcceptMult = 1.3667, AlnsRejectMult = 0.8836, AlnsInitProb = 0.8975, β = 15 000. Notice that ALNS+LS parameters appeared to diverge from common values in the literature (see, e.g., Santini et al [29]). In particular, we would have expected the values of AlnsBestMult, AlnsAcceptMult, and AlnsRejectMult to be closer to 1.0, and that of AlnsInitProb to be much smaller.…”
Section: Metaheuristic Algorithm Parameter Tuningmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting parameter configurations were: AlnsBestMult = 1.9307, AlnsAcceptMult = 1.3667, AlnsRejectMult = 0.8836, AlnsInitProb = 0.8975, β = 15 000. Notice that ALNS+LS parameters appeared to diverge from common values in the literature (see, e.g., Santini et al [29]). In particular, we would have expected the values of AlnsBestMult, AlnsAcceptMult, and AlnsRejectMult to be closer to 1.0, and that of AlnsInitProb to be much smaller.…”
Section: Metaheuristic Algorithm Parameter Tuningmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For these reason, an acceptance criterion that accepts a solution based on its objective value does not seem particularly suited for the PCP. We, therefore, decided to use the "Worse Accept" criterion, proposed by Santini et al [29], which accepts a new solution x if either it uses strictly fewer colors than the current one, or otherwise with a certain probability p, which starts at a high value, and decreases linearly to reach 0 at the end of the solution process. Notice that p does not depend on the value f (x ) of the new solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the focus is shifted from the horse race to gaining knowledge, but the literature is sparse with respect to such studies. One example is [108], which investigates the acceptance criteria for adaptive large neighborhood search, by comparing a range of alternatives. However, the comparisons are carried out on set of instances from only three problems (capacitated vehicle routing problem, capacitated minimum spanning tree problem, quadratic assignment problem), and the authors themselves acknowledge that the conclusions drawn from the experiments will not necessarily apply to all other implementations, or other unrelated problems; they also acknowledge that the relative merit of the acceptance criteria may also change based on the number of iterations that can be run.…”
Section: Motivation For Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few contacted authors suggested including results also for additional articles (not identi ed with Google Scholar, or with no ALNS in the title: [59,107,108,110,123]), which we decided to consider in order to have as many potential studies as possible. These studies therefore did not need to satisfy our eligibility criteria, since the researchers were already clear on precisely what type of information was needed.…”
Section: Identification Selection and Main Properties Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azi et al 2014;Ghilas et al 2016;Kovacs et al 2014;Li et al 2016;Masson et al 2013)-use a Simulated Annealing approach as the acceptance criterion. In their recent evaluation of acceptance criteria for the ALNS, however, Santini et al (2017) conclude that Simulated Annealing does not necessarily provide better results and that linear threshold acceptance excels both in simplicity and in the quality of solutions. Infeasible solutions in terms of distance and assignment constraints are rejected until a feasible solution is found.…”
Section: Acceptance and Stopping Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%