2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
153
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
13
153
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissociation of cardiac changes support earlier experimental study specifically tying cognitive stress effects to cortisol, rather than a more general stress response, and indicates thatFin our populationFthe effects were specific to the acute stress response rather than occurring under baseline conditions. This study has direct implications for understanding the role of cognitive control with respect to behavior modification, including cognitive behavioral therapy, in the treatment of obesity, [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and in understanding how the obese may differ cognitively from the healthy population in the application of these techniques under acute stress. Future studies, using larger participant sample sizes, more rigorous body fat indices, tasks capable of differentiating between specific cognitive functions and targeting more directly the obese population, will further enhance our understanding of the relationship between endocrine and cognitive stress resilience as a function of body fat, and will also explore the implications of these studies with respect to chronic, rather than acute, real-world stressors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dissociation of cardiac changes support earlier experimental study specifically tying cognitive stress effects to cortisol, rather than a more general stress response, and indicates thatFin our populationFthe effects were specific to the acute stress response rather than occurring under baseline conditions. This study has direct implications for understanding the role of cognitive control with respect to behavior modification, including cognitive behavioral therapy, in the treatment of obesity, [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and in understanding how the obese may differ cognitively from the healthy population in the application of these techniques under acute stress. Future studies, using larger participant sample sizes, more rigorous body fat indices, tasks capable of differentiating between specific cognitive functions and targeting more directly the obese population, will further enhance our understanding of the relationship between endocrine and cognitive stress resilience as a function of body fat, and will also explore the implications of these studies with respect to chronic, rather than acute, real-world stressors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with IBT in the first-stage, there is an evidence base for IBT+MR [5,56,57] and ACT [58][59][60][61][62] as second-stage treatment options for weight loss. MR is effective for weight loss, in part, because it alleviates the need for decision-making regarding what food(s) to prepare as well as the time and effort needed to prepare the food.…”
Section: Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research also suggests the promise of ACT for managing or losing weight (Table 2) [58][59][60][61][62]. Although ACT may not produce superior weight losses on average compared to more traditional interventions, ACT may be particularly effective for certain types of individuals, specifically, those who experience higher levels of negative affect, and may, therefore, be a suitable second-stage treatment option for nonresponders.…”
Section: Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, internalized weight stigma was found to be closely related to the unwillingness to stay in contact with, and attempts to control unwanted weight-related internal experiences (Lillis et al, 2010;. In turn, research has been unveiling the pervasive role of experiential avoidance patterns in dealing with eating and weight difficulties (Forman et al, 2007;Lillis & Hayes, 2008;Lillis, Hayes, & Levin, 2011;Weineland, Lillis, & Dahl, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%