2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4739-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study

Abstract: The zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage for ACDF is an effective, reliable, and safe alternate to the conventional method for the treatment of cervical DDD. However, there is no definitive evidence that Fidji cervical cage has better intermediate-term outcomes than the stand-alone cages with a titanium plate for ACDF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
89
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-six studies [20,2224,27,28,34,35,38,39,42,45,47,48,56,57,6062,65,66,6971,73,74,79,81,82,84–86,88,90,91,116] containing 129 patients with CSF of 5007 patients after cervical surgery were included. Figure 15 shows that the incidence was 1.9% (95% CI 1.3%–2.4%), with substantial heterogeneity of incidence observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thirty-six studies [20,2224,27,28,34,35,38,39,42,45,47,48,56,57,6062,65,66,6971,73,74,79,81,82,84–86,88,90,91,116] containing 129 patients with CSF of 5007 patients after cervical surgery were included. Figure 15 shows that the incidence was 1.9% (95% CI 1.3%–2.4%), with substantial heterogeneity of incidence observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-three studies [2022,26,30,34,44,46,48,49,56,60,61,66,73,81,83,84,88,89,92,118,119] containing 372 patients with axial pain of 2650 patients after cervical surgery were included for meta-analysis. Figure 25 shows that the incidence was 15.6% (95% CI 11.7%–19.5%), without substantial heterogeneity of incidence observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li et al mentioned that the results were satisfactory and no significant differences in terms of improvement in the SF-36, VAS, NDI, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, disc height, mean fusion time, fusion rate, adjacent segment degeneration, and restoration of cervical lordosis were observed after ACDF between stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate. Also, the cage group was associated with a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia, shorter operation time, less blood loss, less cost of index surgery, and relatively greater simplicity than the plate group (25). In a similar study, Azab et al reported significant reduction in arm and neck pain, as well as, neck pain and disability scale maintenance over 12 months with no implant-associated complications and radiological fusion by 3 months in all patients treated with a zero-profile implant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several types of cages available for ACDF, including titanium, carbon fiber and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. Complications from the use of ACDF using an interbody cage with anterior cervical plating have led some researchers to examine new systems to avoid these problems (25). Recently, a new type of self-locking stand-alone PEEK cage with no plates or screws has been designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%