2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of a homemade central line simulator to commercial models

Abstract: Our data suggest that an inexpensive, homemade central line model is as good or better than commercially available models. Areas for potential improvement within models include the ultrasound image and ability to appropriately measure manometry of accessed vessels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a homemade simulator made from silicone, tubing, and a pressurized pump system was found to be more highly ranked in quality as compared to three alternative commercial models. 40 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a homemade simulator made from silicone, tubing, and a pressurized pump system was found to be more highly ranked in quality as compared to three alternative commercial models. 40 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugarfree gelatin and psyllium are less prone to mold formation compared with their sugar-based counterparts. Similar models have been described as using gelatin, [2] silicone, [3] ballistics gel, [4] wax, [5,6] and tofu. [7] We believe that, for very low-resource environments, this is a highly functional, low-cost phantom using readily available products and low start-up costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-fidelity models, such as gelatin- or animal tissue-based models, are less anatomically accurate and require preparation but have low cost and high portability. Despite these limitations, when compared to high-fidelity models, low-fidelity models have demonstrated comparable, if not superior, quality [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gelatin-based low-fidelity simulation models are not only low-cost and portable, but also have the added benefits of durability and bacterial resistance when compared to animal tissue-based models. In addition, gelatin-based simulation models can also be easily modified to provide the learner with models that reflect inter-patient anatomic variation, providing additional procedural experience[ 21 ]. As a result, low-fidelity gelatin-based simulation models are able to overcome multiple time and resource limitations by providing a variety of high-quality models at the point of care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%