2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of 5 gutta-percha obturation techniques to replicate canal defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few data are available on whether any particular GP technique is superior for filling canals with resorptive defects (2). In previous studies, radiographic methods (8), image analysis programs (2) and split-tooth models (5,6) have been used to evaluate obturation quality in filled resorptive areas. However, these research methods allow only two-dimensional analyses and cannot properly measure the properties of the root canal filling in the resorption cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few data are available on whether any particular GP technique is superior for filling canals with resorptive defects (2). In previous studies, radiographic methods (8), image analysis programs (2) and split-tooth models (5,6) have been used to evaluate obturation quality in filled resorptive areas. However, these research methods allow only two-dimensional analyses and cannot properly measure the properties of the root canal filling in the resorption cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques have been studied ex vivo to address this deficit in quality when filling internal defects . These studies have evaluated voids, obturation mass and the amount of gutta‐percha (GP) or sealer in the defects, and have shown that significant differences exist between obturation techniques with respect to their ability to fill defects .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, radiographic and micro-computed tomographic methods,[812] image analysis programs,[2] or split-tooth models[910] were used to evaluate the obturation quality of the filled resorptive areas. These studies revealed significant differences among the filling techniques with respect to their capacity to obturate resorptive defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2891011] Voids, obturation masses, and different amounts of gutta-percha or sealer in the defect areas have been evaluated in these studies, which showed differences among obturation techniques with respect to their capacity to fill defects. [28910] Such differences between obturation techniques may alter the quality of the filled apical canals beyond defects, as well as the quality of the obturated resorptive defects. Obturation of the apical canal could be a challenge, while differences in the sealing ability of various filling techniques might appear with the presence of internal resorptive cavities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8 – 10 ] Recently, a new device has been introduced: It is the Endo-Twinn, which is similar to System B plus a vibration source. [ 11 13 ] Also an other recent device, called E-Fill, has been put in the market that is similar to System B but it runs just for 10 seconds. The purpose of this study was to measure the temperatures inside the canal, depending on the time, using the System B, the Endo-Twinn and the E-Fill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%