The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1080/07038992.2014.979488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of 4 Shadow Compensation Techniques for Land Cover Classification of Shaded Areas from High Radiometric Resolution Aerial Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, a DSM and other LiDAR derived features such as sky view factor are used to model different irradiance components which are in turn entered in a non-linear spectral correction model. Direct classification or classification of shaded areas using shaded material training data is a shadow compensation technique that has been applied with relative success for classifying multispectral imagery [38] but remains remarkably unexplored for hyperspectral data. This approach relies on the idea that radiances received from shaded areas are still material dependent and assumes that a significant amount of class related spectral information is still present in shadow [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a DSM and other LiDAR derived features such as sky view factor are used to model different irradiance components which are in turn entered in a non-linear spectral correction model. Direct classification or classification of shaded areas using shaded material training data is a shadow compensation technique that has been applied with relative success for classifying multispectral imagery [38] but remains remarkably unexplored for hyperspectral data. This approach relies on the idea that radiances received from shaded areas are still material dependent and assumes that a significant amount of class related spectral information is still present in shadow [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an optical image, shadows are formed by obstructing direct light. The lower DN values in the shadow areas cause partial or total loss of radiometric information in the affected areas (Dare, 2005;Yuan, 2008;Zhou et al, 2009), the loss of radiometric information is the absence of direct light (Adeline et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2014 In addition, the mean DN values of all plots for the R, G, and B bands in the non-shadow area are non-vegetation>water bodies>vegetation, whereas those in the shadow area are water bodies>non-vegetation>vegetation (Table 3 and Table 4) (Figure 2). Regardless of shadow or non-shadow, the DN values for vegetation in the NIR band are significantly highest than water bodies and non-vegetation, indicating that NIR effectively reflects vegetation conditions (Table 3 and Table 4) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Spectral Characteristics Of the Shadow Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions, target objects in a shadow area are irradiated by the scattered light and reflected light from the surrounding environment (Chakraborti, 2007;Makarau et al, 2011;Adeline et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2014). Conversely, target objects in a non-shadow area not only receive scattered and reflected light, but also direct light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations