2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(00)91051-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of 4 intraoperative methods to determine femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
71
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The proper rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty is essential in avoiding symptomatic flexion gap asymmetry and patellar complications [14,17,22]. A well-established guideline concerning femoral component rotation is to avoid an internal rotation of the implant, as such malrotation of the femoral component makes the patella appear laterally tilted and increases the Q angle [1,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proper rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty is essential in avoiding symptomatic flexion gap asymmetry and patellar complications [14,17,22]. A well-established guideline concerning femoral component rotation is to avoid an internal rotation of the implant, as such malrotation of the femoral component makes the patella appear laterally tilted and increases the Q angle [1,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this fact, several studies indicate an alarming margin of error for the bone landmark referencing techniques, especially for the frequently used PCA method, with a rotational deviation range up to 29° [2,6,10,14,17,21,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been proposed to define the proper alignment during the implantation: the posterior condylar axis (Laskin 1995), the Whiteside line , the balancing technique (Insall et al 1985), the tibial axis (Stiehl and Cherveny 1996), and the transepicondylar axis (Berger et al 1993). The latter is supposed to represent the axis of the knee movement in flexionextension (Hollister et al 1993), and may be the most reliable method for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component (Olcott and Scott 2000). However, some authors have found in a cadaver study that it was less predictable than other techniques (Katz et al 2001), and that the inter-observer variability could reach 23° (Jerosch et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal femur was then cut using an intramedullary alignment guide set at 5°of valgus with anterior referencing instrumentation. Femoral component rotation was determined using the posterior femoral condyles, the epicondylar axis, and Whiteside's line [12][13][14]. Flexion and extension gaps were balanced using spacer blocks, aiming at achieving rectangular and symmetric gaps.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%