1951
DOI: 10.1306/d4269413-2b26-11d7-8648000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Chart for Visual Percentage Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Area occupied by rocks was determined by image analysis, that is, color-based segmentation using the minimum average pixel classification error (Kittler and Illingworth 1986) according to the routine in Mathematica Digital Image Processing 1.1 (Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL). Stoniness within concerned soil depth (0-60 cm) was determined as the sum of: (1) the relative volume of stones (20-200 mm) and boulders ([200 mm), which is proportional to their relative area on the profile wall in soil pits (Folk 1951;Alexander 1982), previously established by the image analysis; (2) the volume of gravel (2-20 mm). It was measured in undisturbed soil samples (200 cm 3 ), also collected for the determination of fine earth bulk density.…”
Section: Land Use Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area occupied by rocks was determined by image analysis, that is, color-based segmentation using the minimum average pixel classification error (Kittler and Illingworth 1986) according to the routine in Mathematica Digital Image Processing 1.1 (Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL). Stoniness within concerned soil depth (0-60 cm) was determined as the sum of: (1) the relative volume of stones (20-200 mm) and boulders ([200 mm), which is proportional to their relative area on the profile wall in soil pits (Folk 1951;Alexander 1982), previously established by the image analysis; (2) the volume of gravel (2-20 mm). It was measured in undisturbed soil samples (200 cm 3 ), also collected for the determination of fine earth bulk density.…”
Section: Land Use Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison chart for visual percentage estimation was used to define the mortar binder/aggregate ratios at the Laboratory of the Department of Geology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU). Binder/aggregate ratios were defined using a comparison chart for visual percentage estimation [42].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flowers were identified to genus or species (Newcomb, 1989; Scoggan, 1957), which was then used to describe floral diversity within each transect. The percent cover of each blooming forb species, and total cover of grasses, forbs (blooming and non‐blooming), and bare ground was visually estimated for each quadrat using the figures provided by Folk (1951). At each sample, cloud cover (sunny, partly cloudy, or overcast) was determined visually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%