1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb03273.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between Visual Estimation and Laboratory Detennination of Blood Loss During the Third Stage of Labour

Abstract: A prospective study was conducted to compare the accuracy of visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) at delivery with laboratory determination of measured blood loss (MBL). It showed that EBL tends to be clouded by the conventional teaching that blood loss at delivery is usually between 200 to 300 mL. Women with MBL up to 150 mL were overestimated and the best correlation was in women with MBL between 150 to 300 mL. There was a tendency to underestimate blood loss when the MBL was between 301 to 500 mL. Of the 9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
104
3
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
11
104
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be of interest and importance to see if similar findings occur in other populations. Clinical estimation of blood loss is notoriously inaccurate 20,21 . The traditional definition of postpartum haemorrhage of blood loss of 500mL carries little clinical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be of interest and importance to see if similar findings occur in other populations. Clinical estimation of blood loss is notoriously inaccurate 20,21 . The traditional definition of postpartum haemorrhage of blood loss of 500mL carries little clinical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to using other tools (history of weight change or urine output), they may use these estimations to help guide clinical judgments. However, HCPs in our study underestimated the larger volumes, at 81.9% and 85.8% of the actual spilled volumes, and overestimated smaller volumes, at 150.4% and 145.1% of the actual spilled volumes (Table 3), a trend that has been found in previous studies investigating HCP accuracy at estimating blood volume (4,5,8). Furthermore, although the length of experience working in health care did not affect participants' ability to estimate volume, Total 60…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…They compared visual Estimation of Blood Loss (EBL) at delivery with laboratory determination of Measured Blood Loss (MBL). There was a tendency to underestimate blood loss when MBL was between 301 to 500 mL [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%