1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08030178.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15 000 examinations

Abstract: In a non-selected population comprising 15,241 women, an evaluation was performed of the ultrasonic measurement of the biparietal diameter compared with a reliable last menstrual period as the basis for estimation of the day of delivery. In women with a reliable menstrual history and spontaneous onset of labor, the ultrasound estimate was the significantly better predictor of the day of delivery in 52% of cases, and the last menstrual period estimate was the better predictor in 46% of cases. The percentages of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
129
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
129
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods have previously been described in detail [111,112]. Establishing gestational age by using the first day of the last menstrual period is not reliable for a variety of reasons including the large number of women who do not know their exact date, have irregular menstrual cycles or amenorrhea, use oral contraceptive pills or bleed in early pregnancy [113]. Using fetal ultrasound data such as crown-rump length or biparietal diameter for pregnancy dating seems to overcome these problems but does not allow growth studies of these measurements since no growth variability between subjects is assumed.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have previously been described in detail [111,112]. Establishing gestational age by using the first day of the last menstrual period is not reliable for a variety of reasons including the large number of women who do not know their exact date, have irregular menstrual cycles or amenorrhea, use oral contraceptive pills or bleed in early pregnancy [113]. Using fetal ultrasound data such as crown-rump length or biparietal diameter for pregnancy dating seems to overcome these problems but does not allow growth studies of these measurements since no growth variability between subjects is assumed.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gestational age was established by fetal ultrasound examination. 37 Information about siblings, day care attendance, and maternal smoking (no or yes) was obtained by questionnaire when the infants were 6 months old.…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fetal ultrasounds were used for both establishing gestational age and assessing fetal growth characteristics (23). Pregnancydating curves were constructed on subjects in the study with complete data on gestational age measured by ultrasound and last menstrual period.…”
Section: Fetal Growth and Birth Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%