1991
DOI: 10.1016/0273-1177(91)90474-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between two strategies of data reduction for the Hipparcos project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…von der Heide 1977), using the natural sparsity and structure of the design matrix. Briefly, there have been two algorithms considered for large astrometric problems, the iterative block adjustment and the global direct solution (Bucciarelli et al 1991). Hipparcos, the only implemented astrometric space mission thus far, relied on the iterative adjustment, in which the major blocks of unknown parameters were estimated and updated in turns, while keeping the other types of parameters fixed, resulting in a number of iterations across the range of mission parameters.…”
Section: Observational Equations and Quasar Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…von der Heide 1977), using the natural sparsity and structure of the design matrix. Briefly, there have been two algorithms considered for large astrometric problems, the iterative block adjustment and the global direct solution (Bucciarelli et al 1991). Hipparcos, the only implemented astrometric space mission thus far, relied on the iterative adjustment, in which the major blocks of unknown parameters were estimated and updated in turns, while keeping the other types of parameters fixed, resulting in a number of iterations across the range of mission parameters.…”
Section: Observational Equations and Quasar Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%