2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between two methods (Warner–Bratzler and texture profile analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
166
4
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
166
4
13
Order By: Relevance
“…MartinezCerezo et al (2005b) observed differences among the Spanish breeds Aragonesa, Churra, and Merino, but found no differences between muscles within the same breeds. Hopkins and Fogarty (1998) observed no differences in the toughness of cooked meat, while Huidobro et al (2005) reported more force was needed to cut cooked than raw meat, which disagrees with the findings of the present study. Table 5 shows the results of meat color.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…MartinezCerezo et al (2005b) observed differences among the Spanish breeds Aragonesa, Churra, and Merino, but found no differences between muscles within the same breeds. Hopkins and Fogarty (1998) observed no differences in the toughness of cooked meat, while Huidobro et al (2005) reported more force was needed to cut cooked than raw meat, which disagrees with the findings of the present study. Table 5 shows the results of meat color.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…No effects of diet were observed for texture profile analysis (P > 0.05). TPA is able to describe meat hardness (de Huidobro et al, 2005), that, in turn, is one of the key criterion for consumers to judge meat quality. Results from the literature on the effect of diet on instrumental variables evaluating meat tenderness are inconsistent, since differences can be confounded by factors such as BW, carcass fatness, slaughtering conditions, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warner-Bratzler test was proved to have better predicative ability than compression test. By contraries, Ruiz de Huidobro et al (2005) concluded that regarding correlations obtained between sensory and instrumental texture indicators in cooked meat, tenderness was better predicted by the Texture Profile Analysis (a double compression cycle) than by the WBSF method.…”
Section: Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few authors used compression test (Caine et al 2003;Sochor et al 2005;Ruiz de Huidobro et al 2005), some only for raw meat evaluation (Maria et al 2003;Sanudo et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%