2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between two different immobilization devices for radiation therapy treatment of pelvic cancer using VMAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All shifts were computed by shifting the treatment couch. The shifts defined as setup errors were recorded and analyzed by systematic and random errors as described previously 7 through the 6 directions (lateral, vertical, and longitudinal, and X, Y, and Z rotational axes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All shifts were computed by shifting the treatment couch. The shifts defined as setup errors were recorded and analyzed by systematic and random errors as described previously 7 through the 6 directions (lateral, vertical, and longitudinal, and X, Y, and Z rotational axes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 In a study conducted by the authors, 2 different immobilization devices for RT treatment of pelvic cancer were compared, and gynecologic tumors and obesity were determined to be associated with greater setup errors in translational directions. 7 Subsequently, the authors turned their focus on gynecologic tumors to determine the magnitude of setup displacement in relation to body mass factors (BMFs) and its effect on the aforementioned target volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Due to improved surveillance and innovations in treatment, early detection of cancer and effective treatment options have become more readily available. 2,3 This has resulted in increasing survival rates for pelvic malignancies. 1 innovation, radiation therapy (RT), has become an integral part of standard treatment for >60% of all cancers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%