2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between traditional kernel-based methods and network analysis: an example from two nearshore shark species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As analytic tools may influence ecological interpretation, future exploration will evaluate age-0 Rose Muskellunge and Northern Pike captured in 2015 using network analysis to provide a more comprehensive picture of young esocid movement (i.e. bidirectional through vegetative corridors; Lédée, Heupel, Tobin, Knip, & Simpfendorfer, 2015), relative to physical habitat features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As analytic tools may influence ecological interpretation, future exploration will evaluate age-0 Rose Muskellunge and Northern Pike captured in 2015 using network analysis to provide a more comprehensive picture of young esocid movement (i.e. bidirectional through vegetative corridors; Lédée, Heupel, Tobin, Knip, & Simpfendorfer, 2015), relative to physical habitat features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several quantitative metrics were calculated from the interconnected network to describe the local and global network structure (19): (i) number of edges, (ii) number of vertices, (iii) degree of centrality and (iv) density. The density defined as the proportion of edges actually present in the network among all possible edges in the data (19). The degree of centrality defined as the overall level of connectedness within the network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NA was based on movements between receiver locations, where the size of the node represented the degree centrality (19). To determine the relative importance of each node within the marine reserves, we calculated the eigenvalues, defining the centrality of each node as a proportion to the sum of the centralities of those nodes to the ones which are connected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations