2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between the Comprehensive Complication Index and the Clavien-Dindo Grading as a Measure of Postoperative Outcome in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery—A Prospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the two scoring systems has been already applied in several studies investigating broad case-mix and heterogeneous populations [8,10,11,[18][19][20]. However, different types of surgical procedures expose patients to peculiar complications and different risks according to the technical details, magnitude of injury, and baseline characteristics of the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of the two scoring systems has been already applied in several studies investigating broad case-mix and heterogeneous populations [8,10,11,[18][19][20]. However, different types of surgical procedures expose patients to peculiar complications and different risks according to the technical details, magnitude of injury, and baseline characteristics of the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this computation CCI appears more precise to capture the overall morbidity burden [8,9]. However, comparison of the two scoring systems have been mostly applied in studies with substantial case-mix and heterogeneous populations [10][11][12]. As it may be more desirable to analyze populations with defined intervention-specific complications, we aimed to assess the performance of CCI and CDC in predicting LOS and excessive LOS (e-LOS) in patients undergoing liver resection for HCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation was performed based on the assumption that a type I error had a probability of 0.05 and power of 0.8. From previous studies in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery, which variously reported the incidence of major complications as 14.2% [20] and 28.6% [21], we assumed that the probability of major complications was 0.15. The correlation coefficient between measured and predicted CRP levels was assumed to be 0.83 (1/1.2 � 0.83), and the odds ratio of major complications with CRP levels > an obtained cut-off value relative to those �the cut-off value was estimated to be 3, based on the previous study on predicting CRP levels on POD1 [16].…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these variables, the pleura adhesion was classi ed into four types (no, light, medium, and high); tumor location into ve types (the top right, top left, bottom right, bottom left and middle right group); smoking history into two types (non-smoking and more than 10 years). CCI is the Chalson comorbidity index [17]. Constantly, blood samples were measured at 1-7 days before surgery and one day after surgery.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found that elderly patients were more likely to have PCCs [14,15], but a prospective American research suggested that age could not predict the occurrence of major postoperative complications [16], and one patient's physique-related indexes could better predict the occurrence of PCCs. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is also a good indicator for evaluating postoperative complications [15,17], and CCI has many overlaps with the criteria for assessing frailty, so both can re ect frailty. In addition, it is still controversial whether intraoperative conversion to thoracotomy and LSHS before surgery can be used as risk factors for PCCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%