2015
DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e31828f5c96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between the Chinese 2008 and the 7th Edition AJCC Staging Systems for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Abstract: We revealed a slightly better patient distribution of overall stage with AJCC comparing with the Chinese 2008 staging system. The prognostic value of AJCC T classification was considered to be better, whereas that of Chinese 2008 N classification was superior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Before treatment, tumor tissues were collected by needle biopsy, fixed in 10% regular formalin, embedded in paraffin, and then serially sectioned (4 µm/section). At diagnosis, the patients were classified according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TMN) classification system published by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) in 2003 [24] (9 patients were stage I, 14 were stage II, 28 were stage III, and 15 were stage IV; 10 were Tx-T1, 17 were T2, 24 were T3, and 15 were T4; 8 were T0, 17 were N1, 12 were N2, and 29 were N3; 66 were M0). No patient showed distant metastasis, and the diagnosis of non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma was according to two well-experienced pathologists using complete pathological data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before treatment, tumor tissues were collected by needle biopsy, fixed in 10% regular formalin, embedded in paraffin, and then serially sectioned (4 µm/section). At diagnosis, the patients were classified according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TMN) classification system published by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) in 2003 [24] (9 patients were stage I, 14 were stage II, 28 were stage III, and 15 were stage IV; 10 were Tx-T1, 17 were T2, 24 were T3, and 15 were T4; 8 were T0, 17 were N1, 12 were N2, and 29 were N3; 66 were M0). No patient showed distant metastasis, and the diagnosis of non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma was according to two well-experienced pathologists using complete pathological data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the 1978 WHO classification (38), all tumors were histopathologically diagnosed as poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas (WHO type III). The clinical stage of the patients was classified according to the 2008 NPC staging system of China (39).…”
Section: Patients and Tissue Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 These findings suggest that the present TNM staging system, based on imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance, is inadequate for detection or prognosis determination because it defines disease mainly on the basis of anatomical information. [8][9][10] New biomarkers are critically needed to aid in clinical decision making and screening for early NPC. Furthermore, because the majority of NPC cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease, lowering the chances of treatment completely eradicating tumors, biomarkers for monitoring therapeutic efficacy and recurrence at follow up time points are also important for the management of NPC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%