2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between short GRB afterglows and kilonova AT2017gfo: shedding light on kilonovae properties

Abstract: Multi-messenger astronomy received a great boost following the discovery of kilonova AT2017gfo, the optical counterpart of the gravitational wave source GW170817 associated with the short Gamma Ray Burst GRB 170817A. AT2017gfo was the first kilonova that could be extensively monitored in time both photometrically and spectroscopically. Previously, only few candidates have been observed against the glare of short GRB afterglows. In this work, we aim to search the fingerprints of AT2017gfo-like kilonova emission… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 and other analyses, such as refs. 54,55 for GRB 160821B, have indicated that these SGRBs are consistent with having kilonovae present. On the other hand, GRB 060614 in particular has a number of possible interpretations, including a tidal disruption event 56 , a WD-NS system 57 or a long GRB 58 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…26 and other analyses, such as refs. 54,55 for GRB 160821B, have indicated that these SGRBs are consistent with having kilonovae present. On the other hand, GRB 060614 in particular has a number of possible interpretations, including a tidal disruption event 56 , a WD-NS system 57 or a long GRB 58 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, AT2017gfo is only one (well studied) event. The indication from cosmological GRBs is that KNe show considerable diversity in their emission (Fong et al 2017;Gompertz et al 2018;Ascenzi et al 2019;Rossi et al 2020), meaning that the model employed here may be too optimistic/pessimistic in its peak magnitude, or evolve faster/slower than any given future event. AT2017gfo is fainter than all but one sGRB KN candidate, but in several cases non-detections that probe deeper than the AT2017gfo models imply that there is room for a fainter, undetected population (Gompertz et al 2018;Pandey et al 2019).…”
Section: Factors That Influence Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the rich optical/infrared observations available, it is tempting to use AT2017gfo as a prototypical KN to set the fading (or rising) thresholds to photometrically select KN candidates based on their photometric evolution. However, AT2017gfo is unlikely to be representative for its class, as deep follow-up and joint afterglow and KN fits of short GRBs have demonstrated (Gompertz et al 2018;Ascenzi et al 2019;Rossi et al 2020). Instead, we chose thresholds for the fading rate based on a grid of KN models constructed with the Monte Carlo radiative transfer code POSSIS (Bulla 2019).…”
Section: Photometry and Candidate Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%