2020 IEEE XXVII International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/intercon50315.2020.9220263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between optimal LQR control and LQR predictive control of a planar robot of 2DOF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even though MPC allows optimization of system performance based on the desired criteria, the computational power of this method remains a significant downside that limits its proliferation. Creating a complex mathematical model, as well as computing the optimal solution at each time step, is a challenging task for most mechanisms and productions [21,108].…”
Section: Other Modern Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even though MPC allows optimization of system performance based on the desired criteria, the computational power of this method remains a significant downside that limits its proliferation. Creating a complex mathematical model, as well as computing the optimal solution at each time step, is a challenging task for most mechanisms and productions [21,108].…”
Section: Other Modern Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study looked at a "X-configuration quadcopter" and the saturation function, but the main flaw was that it ignored external disturbances. There are several LQR controllers designed for quadcopters in the literature [5][6][7]. Dhewa et al [8] designed and implemented a quadrotor control system based on the LQR method to find the best value for the feedback gain K in the hover condition.…”
Section: Original Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the inertia of the rotor, and , , and are the inertia of the quadrotor in and respectively. (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) Where b is the thrust coefficient and d is the drag coefficient. The angular speed for each rotor is .…”
Section: Quadcopter Working Principle and Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various papers have studied helical motion resolvers [5]- [6]. However, 2-DOF planar electrical machines, which are used in x-y Tables, pantograph type planar robots [7], scanning probe microscopes, and optical fiber alignments [8], need the mover position measured in two perpendicular directions of linear motion. Different types of linear position sensors are proposed in the literature [9]- [12], and the concept design for the 2-DOF linear resolver is presented in [12] for the first time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%