2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2010.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between neural network method and semi empirical equations to predict the solubility of different compounds in supercritical carbon dioxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Input data were randomized into three sets: learning, validation, and testing. Usually, 30% of data are used for testing, and the remaining 70% for training and validation (Mehdizadeh and Movagharnejad 2011). The experimental data included 92 data points.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input data were randomized into three sets: learning, validation, and testing. Usually, 30% of data are used for testing, and the remaining 70% for training and validation (Mehdizadeh and Movagharnejad 2011). The experimental data included 92 data points.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of network used in this work is the MLP network. MLP networks are one of the most popular and successful neural network architectures, which are suited to a wide range of applications such as prediction and process modeling (Sastri and Rao, 1995;Movagharnejad and Nikzad, 2007;Mehdizadeh and Movagharnejad, 2011;Movagharnejad et al, 2011).…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurons are connected by weights that are modified during the learning phase [14]. All neural networks have three main layers which are called input, hidden and output layers [16]. Many classes of neural networks exist in the literature such as, feed forward back propagation, recurrent neural networks, cascade correlation neural networks and radial basis function neural networks.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%