2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi8050240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between Major Artificial Intelligence Models for Crop Yield Prediction: Case Study of the Midwestern United States, 2006–2015

Abstract: This paper compares different artificial intelligence (AI) models in order to develop the best crop yield prediction model for the Midwestern United States (US). Through experiments to examine the effects of phenology using three different periods, we selected the July–August (JA) database as the best months to predict corn and soybean yields. Six different AI models for crop yield prediction are tested in this research. Then, a comprehensive and objective comparison is conducted between the AI models. Particu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2016) could predict US corn yield with 30 years of data using random forest with the prediction RRMSE of 16.7%; while Crane-Droesch (2018) could achieve out-of-bag USDA corn prediction error of 13.4% using semiparametric neural network with a data set comprised of the information for years 1979–2016. Kim et al. (2019) designed a model which predicted cross-validation out-of-bag samples with a RRMSE of 7.9% ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2016) could predict US corn yield with 30 years of data using random forest with the prediction RRMSE of 16.7%; while Crane-Droesch (2018) could achieve out-of-bag USDA corn prediction error of 13.4% using semiparametric neural network with a data set comprised of the information for years 1979–2016. Kim et al. (2019) designed a model which predicted cross-validation out-of-bag samples with a RRMSE of 7.9% ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…You et al (2017) applied CNNs and RNNs to predict soybean yield based on a sequence of remotely sensed images. Kim et al (2019) developed a deep neural network model for crop yield prediction using optimized input variables from satellite products and meteorological datasets between 2006 and 2015. Wang et al (2018) designed a deep learning framework to predict soybean crop yields in Argentina and they also achieved satisfactory results with a transfer learning approach to predict Brazil soybean harvests with a smaller amount of data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task is then to find a functional form for that can correctly predict new cases using SVM [7] [15] [22] [25] [26] [31]. This can be achieved by training the SVM model on a sample set , i.e., training set, a process that involves, like classification ( see above ), the sequential optimization of an error function.…”
Section: Algorithm -Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…study used the dataset [22] of crop yield of 25 districts of Tamil Nadu and US region (provided by Michigan State University, USA). Many factors have an impact on the crop yield .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%