2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2013.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between laypeople and orthodontists in evaluating the effect of buccal corridor and smile arc on smile esthetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,12,15,20,25 Our findings show that of 4 groups of evaluators, the ORT were the most perceptive when it came to crowding of the maxillary incisors as seen from the front of the patient. The LNO group was the least sensitive to crowding of the maxillary teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…10,12,15,20,25 Our findings show that of 4 groups of evaluators, the ORT were the most perceptive when it came to crowding of the maxillary incisors as seen from the front of the patient. The LNO group was the least sensitive to crowding of the maxillary teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It showed that dentists were more sensitive in detecting various malocclusions from photographs. 13 Severe crowding and moderate crowding were the least attractive malocclusion. There were no differences between dentist's and non-dentist's perceptions of facial attractiveness showing severe crowding and moderate crowding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This photograph produced an image with a broad smile (0% BCS). The BCS was then digitally modified, to add 5% increments of dark space from 0% to 25% [17]. This produced a set of six images with different amounts of BCS (Fig.…”
Section: Smile Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%