A Comparison between Laboratory and Wearable Sensors in the Context of Physiological Synchrony

Abstract

Measuring concurrent changes in autonomic physiological responses aggregated across individuals (Physiological Synchrony -PS) can provide insight into group-level cognitive or emotional processes.Utilizing cheap and easy-to-use wearable sensors to measure physiology rather than their highend laboratory counterparts is desirable. Since it is currently ambiguous how different signal properties (arising from different types of measuring equipment) influence the detection of PS associated with mental processes, it is unclear whether, or to what extent, PS based on data from wearables compares to that from their laboratory equivalents. Existing literature has investigated PS using both types of equipment, but none compared them directly. In this study, we measure PS in electrodermal activity (EDA) and inter-beat interval (IBI, inverse of heart rate) of participants who listened to the same audio stream but were either instructed to attend to the presented narrative (n=13) or to the interspersed auditory events (n=13). Both laboratory and wearable sensors were used (ActiveTwo electrocardiogram (ECG) and EDA; Wahoo Tickr and EdaMove4). A participant's attentional condition was classified based on which attentional group they shared greater synchrony with. For both types of sensors, we found classification accuracies of 73% or higher in both EDA and IBI. We found no significant difference in classification accuracies between the laboratory and wearable sensors. These findings encourage the use of wearables for PS based research and for in-the-field measurements.

Integrating Cognitive Developmental Neuroscience in Society: Lessons Learned From a Multidisciplinary Research Project on Education and Social Safety of Youth

“…Classifying a single participant into one of the two instructional groups could be done with 96% accuracy when using synchrony of EEG, and with 73% accuracy when using heart rate and skin conductance. In addition, the reliability of the wearable data that were collected with equipment suitable for real-life settings was similar to the reliability of laboratory equipment ( Van Beers et al, 2020 ), and we observed physiological synchrony in skin conductance and heart rate recorded through wearables in actual classroom settings ( Stuldreher et al, 2021 ). Directly comparing experimental laboratory equipment with equipment suitable for real-life settings form a crucial step in tackling issues around the technical limits to use neurocognitive measures in classroom settings ( evaluation ).…”

Physiological Synchrony in EEG, Electrodermal Activity and Heart Rate Detects Attentionally Relevant Events in Time

“…EDA and heart rate were also recorded using wearable systems (Movisens EdaMove 4 and Wahoo Tickr, respectively). These data are discussed elsewhere ( Borovac et al, 2020 ; Van Beers et al, 2020 ).…”

Challenges and Opportunities in Consumer Neuroergonomics

“…Examples of products in this industry are wrist and headbands to monitor and reduce own stress levels, or gadgets to detect mood for entertaining purposes. A trending subfield in scientific studies and industry are tools to modulate brain activity directly through neurostimulation (Tyler et al, 2017;Vosskuhl et al, 2018).…”