2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.872829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between intensity and depth images for extracting features related to wear labels in carpets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some parts of the method have been explained in detail in previous papers [13][14][15][23][24][25][26]. In this paper we present an optimal combination of the previous findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some parts of the method have been explained in detail in previous papers [13][14][15][23][24][25][26]. In this paper we present an optimal combination of the previous findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We tested the algorithm using certified photographs for the American standard and photographs taken under fixed luminance conditions for the European standard. Although the method correctly distinguished AR grades in certified photographs, we found that non certified photographs are non-robust enough for describing the appearance changes of carpets [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 Manufacturers however require a more objective assessment because the human assessment is often too subjective. Much effort has been devoted to automate this rating process, initially on techniques extracting texture features from digital images, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and lately combining features from digital and range images,, [13][14][15][16] where a range image represents the depth information of the surface of a carpet. The range images are obtained with a 3D scanner designed specifically for scanning carpets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like in a previous approach, 14 the technique has been tested in both intensity and range images from a database composed of samples from the EN1471:1996 standard. 3 The results show that the discriminance between consecutive degrees of wear increases by reducing the noise given by the patters that do not change with the wear labels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%