2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to software requirements selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ganesh et al (2015) suggested the use of a multi-criteria decision-making model to identify the critical path in road transport networks by employing an integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS method. Nazim et al (2022) applied an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method to evaluate different software requirements. Therefore, the comprehensive AHP-TOPSIS method can effectively solve the problem of performance evaluation with respect to GASC.…”
Section: Related Work On Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganesh et al (2015) suggested the use of a multi-criteria decision-making model to identify the critical path in road transport networks by employing an integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS method. Nazim et al (2022) applied an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method to evaluate different software requirements. Therefore, the comprehensive AHP-TOPSIS method can effectively solve the problem of performance evaluation with respect to GASC.…”
Section: Related Work On Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-measures decision for locating uses the "M" option in the numerical mathematical mean arrangement, as well as the "M" point and "N" layered area FTOPSIS system. The foundation of the FTOPSIS approaches is the possibility of the total and greatest departure from the favorable ideal preparation-the unfavorable perfect answer for the ideal and least ideal plans., respectively [27] by using the FTOPSIS approach, it is able to evaluate the viability and compatibility of the alternative choice with the standards. The pattern implies that FTOPSIS assigns fuzzy numbers to ensure consistency in a fuzzy environment while taking into account the importance of models.…”
Section: Fuzzy Topsis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "M" choice in the numerical mathematical mean arrangement, together with the "M" point and "N" layered area FTOPSIS system, are utilized in the multi-measures decision for locating. The foundation of the FTOPSIS methods is the possibility of the absolute and furthest division from the positive ideal preparation, unfavorable ideal solution for the ideal and least ideal plan, respectively [27]. The effectiveness of the other option and component in regard to the rules can be evaluated using the FTOPSIS approach.…”
Section: A Fuzzy Topsis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%