2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between finite volume and switched moving boundary approaches for dynamic vapor compression system modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the simulation of the start-up process of the heat pump, which for example starts with the evaporator being totally in the two phase mode and ends with the creation of a superheating zone, is not possible. Switching between various Moving Boundaries implementations, leading to a Switching Moving Boundary model, seems to allow the examination of the heat pump operation during start up and shutdown procedures [65][66][67], but since in this work attention was given mainly to the continuous operation of the cascading hybrid system under varying conditions, the classical but simpler moving boundary models described in [68] by Willatzen et al was employed. In the next section, a general overview of the methodology is presented, while the complete set of equations is included in the Appendices A and B.…”
Section: Heat Exchangers Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the simulation of the start-up process of the heat pump, which for example starts with the evaporator being totally in the two phase mode and ends with the creation of a superheating zone, is not possible. Switching between various Moving Boundaries implementations, leading to a Switching Moving Boundary model, seems to allow the examination of the heat pump operation during start up and shutdown procedures [65][66][67], but since in this work attention was given mainly to the continuous operation of the cascading hybrid system under varying conditions, the classical but simpler moving boundary models described in [68] by Willatzen et al was employed. In the next section, a general overview of the methodology is presented, while the complete set of equations is included in the Appendices A and B.…”
Section: Heat Exchangers Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details about the MB method can be found in [3,36]: The differential equations of the working fluid mass conservation, working fluid energy conservation, heat source energy conservation, and tube wall energy conservation are listed in Equations (1)-(4) respectively considering the above assumptions. More details about the FV method can be found in [34]:…”
Section: Condenser and Receiver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expander was replaced with a nozzle model in this paper [34]. The working fluid mass flow rate, the output power of the expander, and the working fluid enthalpy at the outlet of the expander can be described as Equations (12)- (14), respectively:…”
Section: Pump and Expander Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a "switched" MB (SMB) model, the governing equations are derived separately for each possible combination of fluid phase zones in the heat exchanger, which are treated as modes of the plant [14]. The model then switches between the set of equations for each mode in order to accurately capture the component behavior across multiple phase flow combinations.…”
Section: Nonlinear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air inlet temperature to each heat exchanger will be treated as a disturbance signal in this work. A complete derivation of the nonlinear VCS models can be found in [15], and their validation with a 1kW experimental system can be found in [12] and [14].…”
Section: Fig 3 Condenser Modementioning
confidence: 99%