1974
DOI: 10.1136/thx.29.3.352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between fine-needle biopsy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients with lung lesions

Abstract: 1974). Thorax, 29,[352][353][354]. A comparison between fine-needle biopsy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients with lung lesions. We present a series of 40 patients with lung lesions in whom a specific diagnosis was not obtained by conventional methods of examination and in whom tumour was not visualized directly by bronchoscopy with a flexible bronchoscope. Bronchial brushing and blind biopsytaking were performed and the results were compared with those of fine-needle aspiration biopsy. The percentage of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twice as many were diagnosed by aspiration biopsy as with sputum cytology. 28 In two series, fine-needle aspiration was also found superior to bronchial brushing, most often with tumors not diagnosed by sputum cytology or bronchial washings or not visualized at bronchoscopy even with the popular flexible bronchoscope. 27 ' 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Twice as many were diagnosed by aspiration biopsy as with sputum cytology. 28 In two series, fine-needle aspiration was also found superior to bronchial brushing, most often with tumors not diagnosed by sputum cytology or bronchial washings or not visualized at bronchoscopy even with the popular flexible bronchoscope. 27 ' 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides the limitation related to size, the efficacy of fibreoptic bronchoscopy depends on the nature of the lesion and its relation to bronchial tree. Borgeskov S. et al 14 concluded that peripheral endobronchial tumour cannot be visualised and FNA may give a diagnostic accuracy of 60%-80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diag nostic accuracy in proven pulmonary card-noma was 40%> with FFB and 72°/» with needle aspiration. When the roentgenographic location of the lesion was taken into consideration, central lesions were diag nosed with similar accuracy using either ap proach, but once the lesion was not contig uous to the hilum, the needle proved to have the best yield [11], Hagai a el al. [10] reported 96 cases of proven pulmonary car cinomas and showed that lesions in the lo bar or segmental branches had better accu racy with FFB, but once the lesions were peripheral, FFB had an accuracy at only 61.5%, compared to the needle accuracy of 86.7% [10],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borgeskov and Francis [11] performed needle aspiration biopsy on 40 patients with primary lung cancer who had no visible en dobronchial lesion during FFB. The diag nostic accuracy in proven pulmonary card-noma was 40%> with FFB and 72°/» with needle aspiration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation