“…The diag nostic accuracy in proven pulmonary card-noma was 40%> with FFB and 72°/» with needle aspiration. When the roentgenographic location of the lesion was taken into consideration, central lesions were diag nosed with similar accuracy using either ap proach, but once the lesion was not contig uous to the hilum, the needle proved to have the best yield [11], Hagai a el al. [10] reported 96 cases of proven pulmonary car cinomas and showed that lesions in the lo bar or segmental branches had better accu racy with FFB, but once the lesions were peripheral, FFB had an accuracy at only 61.5%, compared to the needle accuracy of 86.7% [10],…”