2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x18000699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between Differently Skilled Prehospital Emergency Care Providers in Major-Incident Triage in South Africa

Abstract: Accuracy of major-incident triage across all levels of prehospital providers in South Africa is less than optimal with non-significant differences post-major-incident training. Prior major-incident training played a significant role in triage accuracy indicating that training should be an ongoing process. Although ALS providers were the quickest to complete triage, this difference was not clinically significant. The BLS and ILS providers with major-incident training can thus be utilized for primary major-incid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these assessments were conducted immediately at the end of the course, the data from another study of EMS providers in South Africa showed that prior training is associated with enhanced future performance. 21 Assessing the providers long-term knowledge retention serves as a future opportunity for research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these assessments were conducted immediately at the end of the course, the data from another study of EMS providers in South Africa showed that prior training is associated with enhanced future performance. 21 Assessing the providers long-term knowledge retention serves as a future opportunity for research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently MCI triage accuracy rates are measured against the following documented field triage accuracy rates for field triage ( 20): an under-triage rate of less than 5% to ensure that critically injured casualties are captured, and an over-triage rate of less than 50% to ensure that medical facilities are not overwhelmed with casualties. It has been shown that the current field triage accuracy rates for MCI triage may be inappropriate (23) and overstated for MCI triage. Cuttance et al ( 15) have shown that it is possible to achieve under-and over-triage rates of 2.8% and 7.0% respectively using supportive documentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sometimes triage mistakes lead to patients being categorized incorrectly, which ultimately results in the inappropriate use of resources, hindering the provision of efficient emergency care [33][34][35]. Under-triage happens when patients who need immediate care for life-threatening injuries are wrongly assigned to receive that care later, while over-triage happens when patients with non-critical injuries are labeled as urgent and need immediate care [36][37][38].…”
Section: Field Performancementioning
confidence: 99%