2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between different numerical formulations for welding arc representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from numerical simulation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], different experimental methods have been developed to study the energy distribution of TIG arcs; e.g. spectroscopy [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and arc pressure measurement [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from numerical simulation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], different experimental methods have been developed to study the energy distribution of TIG arcs; e.g. spectroscopy [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and arc pressure measurement [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has focussed on the current and power density distributions with weld currents >100 ampere arcs involving different experimental techniques such as spectroscopy [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] , non-invasive laser-scattering 2, [14][15][16] , arc pressure measurement [17][18][19][20] , Langmuir probe 21,22 and split anode calorimetry for GTAW 2,4,14,15,[23][24][25][26][27] and Plasma Arc Welding 28 . In addition, numerical modelling has been extensively used to simulate gas shielded tungsten arcs and their interaction with the work piece e 25,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work, a numerical model of an atmospheric pressure argon arc with a non-consumable DC-negative electrode was developed, solved numerically through the CFD code PHOENICS, and validated against experimental results and other numerical models by comparing the main arc characteristics and arc-weld pool interactions extensively [19], [20]. The main assumptions to model the arc column include considering Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE), axisymmetry, and optically transparent plasma in a steady state.…”
Section: Arc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the electric potential conservation equation is solved to obtain the electromagnetic variables. This procedure is called the "potential approach" [21]. Next, Ohm's law is used to calculate the current density's axial and radial components, and Ampere's law allows for obtaining the azimuthal magnetic field.…”
Section: Arc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%