2009 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/isspit.2009.5407540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between allophone, syllable, and diphone based TTS systems for Kurdish language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concatenative synthesis generally produces the most natural soundingsynthesized speech. According to [49], choosing a segment is one of the most challenging steps in concatenative synthesis. There are three main types of concatenative synthesis:…”
Section: Concatenative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concatenative synthesis generally produces the most natural soundingsynthesized speech. According to [49], choosing a segment is one of the most challenging steps in concatenative synthesis. There are three main types of concatenative synthesis:…”
Section: Concatenative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And between all three systems, the diphone-based TTS system had the best quality. In the same year in [44] , a comparison was made between the three systems of allophone, syllable, and diphone for the Kurdish TTS system through the use of concatenation. The diphone-based TTS system had the best quality and best Diagnostic-Rhyme-Test DRT (97%).…”
Section: Kurdish Tts Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-One-to-one mappings (Figure 1(a)), covering a large subset of the characters; -One-to-two mappings (Figure 1(a)), which reflect the inherent discrepancies between the two writing systems [Barkhoda et al 2009]. While transliterating between these two alphabets, the contextual information can provide hints in choosing the right counterpart.…”
Section: Script Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%