2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2013.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison among stochastic optimization algorithms for parameter estimation of biochemical kinetic models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of four Arrhenius parameters [lnkjTnormalrefand EA j ], T ref = 210 ° C , were estimated concomitantly by minimizing the least squares objective function [Eqn (5)]. The optimization algorithm used was Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and the solution was refined using the MatLab ® built‐in routine nlinfit . The ODE system was solved with MatLab ® built‐in routine ode15s .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of four Arrhenius parameters [lnkjTnormalrefand EA j ], T ref = 210 ° C , were estimated concomitantly by minimizing the least squares objective function [Eqn (5)]. The optimization algorithm used was Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and the solution was refined using the MatLab ® built‐in routine nlinfit . The ODE system was solved with MatLab ® built‐in routine ode15s .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, according to this result, any meta-heuristics working in a continuous domain and showing outstanding performance when applied to benchmark test functions might not work well on (a subset of) real-world problems [15]. For instance, Da Ros et al [16] com- In this paper, we investigate the problem of the Parameter Estimation (PE) of biochemical systems, typical of Systems Biology analyses [17,18]. This research field aims at a thorough understanding of biological processes at a systemlevel by explicitly considering the complex interactions among biomolecules [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems tackled are both benchmarks [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and real-life [18][19][20][21]. Some examples for chemical engineering applications include: oxidation processes [22][23][24], energy, fuels and petrol derivatives [25][26][27][28][29], fermentation [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%