1975
DOI: 10.1177/030006057500300503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Trial of Minocin (Minocycline Hydrochloride) and Ampicillin in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis

Abstract: One hundred and fifteen patients suffering from acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis took part in a double-blind, multicentre, clinical trial designed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of ampicillin and minocycline hydrochloride, a new, long-acting, semi-synthetic tetracycline. Both antibiotics were equally successful in treatment, there being no statistically significant difference between the two in any of the parameters studied. Side-effects were few and far between. Only one patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common reason to justify a head-to-head trial was that antibiotics are effective against organisms most commonly associated with purulent sputum in chronic bronchitis, such as Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae . Thus rather than citing evidence from placebo-controlled trials, they referred to the in-vitro activity of antibiotics (for example [ 18 , 19 ]). Yet another group of head-to-head trials referred to placebo-controlled trials to justify their head-to-head trials but selectively cited only those trials with positive results [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common reason to justify a head-to-head trial was that antibiotics are effective against organisms most commonly associated with purulent sputum in chronic bronchitis, such as Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae . Thus rather than citing evidence from placebo-controlled trials, they referred to the in-vitro activity of antibiotics (for example [ 18 , 19 ]). Yet another group of head-to-head trials referred to placebo-controlled trials to justify their head-to-head trials but selectively cited only those trials with positive results [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%